<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Spares Mozilla. Evil or Good?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joshua-mcclure.com/google-spares-mozilla/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joshua-mcclure.com/google-spares-mozilla/</link>
	<description>&#60;i&#62;Austin&#039;s most prolific iphone developer.&#60;/i&#62;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:10:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: @mikeh2bi</title>
		<link>http://joshua-mcclure.com/google-spares-mozilla/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>@mikeh2bi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 06:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshua-mcclure.com/?p=29#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Very interesting.  As with most in the online space, firefox add-ons help us get through the day - any idea why Chrome doesn&#039;t support add-ons like Firefox does?  I was suprised to learn that this was the major flaw with Chrome.  And it seems if Chrome had the capability for add-ons then it would be a clear cut winner in the browser race.

Did a search for &quot;chrome add ons&quot; (on Google of course!) and found mychromeaddons.com.  There&#039;s a handful there but nothing I would bother using.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting.  As with most in the online space, firefox add-ons help us get through the day &#8211; any idea why Chrome doesn&#8217;t support add-ons like Firefox does?  I was suprised to learn that this was the major flaw with Chrome.  And it seems if Chrome had the capability for add-ons then it would be a clear cut winner in the browser race.</p>
<p>Did a search for &#8220;chrome add ons&#8221; (on Google of course!) and found mychromeaddons.com.  There&#8217;s a handful there but nothing I would bother using.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lord Sultan Kingfordczar</title>
		<link>http://joshua-mcclure.com/google-spares-mozilla/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Lord Sultan Kingfordczar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2009 03:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joshua-mcclure.com/?p=29#comment-2</guid>
		<description>They have a contract with Firefox that Firefox defaults to Google for its search features. It expires, I think, next year, and from the looks of it, Google isn&#039;t going to renew the contract. I expect once it expires they will be promoting Chrome on any non-Chrome browser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They have a contract with Firefox that Firefox defaults to Google for its search features. It expires, I think, next year, and from the looks of it, Google isn&#8217;t going to renew the contract. I expect once it expires they will be promoting Chrome on any non-Chrome browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

